PAUL v. WIJERAMA
| Jurisdiction | Sri Lanka |
| Date | 24 April 1972 |
| Type of Document | Case report |
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 practice notes
-
CURT ALOIS TWERENBOLD VS HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL AND OTHERS - HON MAHINDA SAMAYAWARDHENA, J.
...application for writ of certiorari is allowed without costs.1 ____________________ 1Vide also the leading case of Paul v. Wijerama (1972) 75 NLR 361. 8 In the instant case, it is clear that (a) there is no Award as contemplated by section 6(1) of the Act, and (b) the purported Award marked ......
-
C.A WRIT 319/2014 Curt Alois Twerenbold Vs Hon. Attorney General and Others - Hon Mahinda Samayawardhena, J.
...marked P14. The application for writ of certiorari is allowed without costs.1 1 Vide also the leading case of Paul v. Wijerama (1972) 75 NLR 361. 8 In the instant case, it is clear that (a) there is no Award as contemplated by section 6(1) of the Act, and (b) the purported Award marked R1 (......
-
C.A WRIT 319/2014 Curt Alois Twerenbold Vs Hon. Attorney General and Others - Hon Mahinda Samayawardhena, J.
...marked P14. The application for writ of certiorari is allowed without costs.1 1 Vide also the leading case of Paul v. Wijerama (1972) 75 NLR 361. 8 In the instant case, it is clear that (a) there is no Award as contemplated by section 6(1) of the Act, and (b) the purported Award marked R1 (......
-
WIJERAMA v. PAUL
...and complainant concerned and helpful to the appellate authority. APPEAL from a judgment of the Supreme Court reported in (1972) 75 N. L. R. 361. N. Satyendra, with D. C. Amarasinghe and R. D. C. de SILVA, for the appellants. H. W. Jayewardene, with G. Candappa, Mark Fernando, Miss U. J. Ku......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
CURT ALOIS TWERENBOLD VS HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL AND OTHERS - HON MAHINDA SAMAYAWARDHENA, J.
...application for writ of certiorari is allowed without costs.1 ____________________ 1Vide also the leading case of Paul v. Wijerama (1972) 75 NLR 361. 8 In the instant case, it is clear that (a) there is no Award as contemplated by section 6(1) of the Act, and (b) the purported Award marked ......
-
C.A WRIT 319/2014 Curt Alois Twerenbold Vs Hon. Attorney General and Others - Hon Mahinda Samayawardhena, J.
...marked P14. The application for writ of certiorari is allowed without costs.1 1 Vide also the leading case of Paul v. Wijerama (1972) 75 NLR 361. 8 In the instant case, it is clear that (a) there is no Award as contemplated by section 6(1) of the Act, and (b) the purported Award marked R1 (......
-
C.A WRIT 319/2014 Curt Alois Twerenbold Vs Hon. Attorney General and Others - Hon Mahinda Samayawardhena, J.
...marked P14. The application for writ of certiorari is allowed without costs.1 1 Vide also the leading case of Paul v. Wijerama (1972) 75 NLR 361. 8 In the instant case, it is clear that (a) there is no Award as contemplated by section 6(1) of the Act, and (b) the purported Award marked R1 (......
-
WIJERAMA v. PAUL
...and complainant concerned and helpful to the appellate authority. APPEAL from a judgment of the Supreme Court reported in (1972) 75 N. L. R. 361. N. Satyendra, with D. C. Amarasinghe and R. D. C. de SILVA, for the appellants. H. W. Jayewardene, with G. Candappa, Mark Fernando, Miss U. J. Ku......
Request a trial to view additional results